• Frequency weightings: A, B, C and Z

    In the loudness contours reference, we learned that the frequency response of the human ear is not flat and it also varies considerably with listening level. To try and approximate acoustical analyzers to the response of the ear, frequency weighting curves were created. These are simplified versions of the ears' frequency response at different levels. Thus, for low sound pressure levels, the A weighting is used, which provides substantial low frequency attenuation (-50 dB at 20 Hz and almost -20 dB at 100 Hz) and some high frequency attenuation (about -10 dB at 20 kHz). The A weighting is adequate for the measurement of background noise, which is low level by nature.

    The B weighting is used for intermediate levels and is similar to A, except for the fact that low frequency attenuation is a lot less extreme, though still significant (-10 dB a 60 Hz). Recent studies show this is the best weighting to use for musical listening purposes.

    The C weighting is similar to B and A as far as the high frequencies are concerned. In the low frequency range it hardly provides attenuation. This weighting is used for high level noise. The different weightings can be graphically compared on the graph above.
    These weightings are not very accurate for two reasons. Firstly, they are based on the inverse of the Fletcher & Munson contours, which are old and provide substantial error, since they were measured with the limited instrumentation of the time. Secondly, the curves are simple and do not include significant inflexions happening in the mid-range (around 3500 Hz) as well as the high frequencies. This last reason is due to the fact that the weightings were designed around practical -and hence very simple- electrical circuits for the time. For those reasons the weightings are not all that accurate as they do not reflect the exact behaviour of the ear, although they do provide basic attenuation in the low and high frequencies that approximately simulates the varying responses of the ear at different levels. Nowadays it would be possible to define new weightings based on more exact loudness contours, and they could take more complex shapes that reflected ear responses more accurately and be easily realizable with current electronics. However, decades of use of the classic standard weightings seem to be an obstacle when it comes to standardizing a new set of more exact weighting curve.

    Measurements taken using the aforementioned weightings are denoted by writing the weighting letter in parenthesis after "dB". Thus we speak of dB (A), dB (B) or dB (C). There exist other weightings for special applications such as D, for very high pressure aeronautical noise.

    On a sound level meter (SLM) we should select weighting B for measuring loudspeaker enclosures in the listening area. If B is not available and we are forced to choose between A and C, we should pick C. If only A is available, we should use not weighting. If, for environmental reasons, we are after the lowest possible sound pressure reading, we should choose A, since it is the weighting that provides the most attenuation.

    In recent years the B-weighting has been phased out from sound pressure meters (and from the 2003 edition of IEC 61672) and the 'linear' ('unweighted') position has been replaced by the Z-weighting, which is the same except that the minimum frequency band in which the response must be flat (10Hz to 20kHz, ±1.5 dB) is specified.

    In telecommunication, the term 'psophometric weighting' is used, and the CCITT and 'C-Message' curves, which are more extreme in terms of attenuation of highs and lows than the C-weighting, are utilized.

  • Ad

  • News

    Extron 4K/60 HDMI audio De-Embedder now shipping

    Extron has announced the availability of the HAE 100 4K Plus audio de-embedder. The HAE 100 4K Plus extracts audio from a 4K HDMI source,... Read more

    ISE postponed to June 2021

    MUNICH 15 SEPTEMBER 2020: After a period of consultation with the industry and the impact of the ongoing pandemic, Integrated Systems Events announce that ISE, scheduled for 2-5 February, has been postponed and will... Read more

    QSC Announces New Q-SYS Core Processors

    QSC has launched two new audio, video, and control processors native to the Q-SYS Ecosystem – the smaller Q-SYS Core 8 Flex and Q-SYS Core Nano. Driven by the proliferation of networked endpoints and the expanding... Read more

    Verlinde launches Stagemaker SL5 and SlL0 chain hoists

    Verlinde has announced the widening of its new range of Stagemaker electric chain hoists dedicated to the entertainment industry. The new Stagemaker SL5 and SL10 models with their load capacity... Read more
  • Recent articles

    Parallel and series connections: description and calculations

    In this article we'll explain impedance calculations as simply as possible, as well as describe the different types of connection.... Read more

    Loudspeaker impedance

    Measured in ohms (symbol, Ω, upper case Greek letter omega), electrical impedance is defined as the opposition to the flow of alternating current by means of presenting an electrical load. In a loudspeaker, impedance varies with frequency, so manufacturers often publish "impedance curves" showing impedance with frequency for passive units. These curves give us... Read more

    Balanced and unbalanced connections

    There are two basic ways to carry an electrical audio signal.

    • The first one is unbalanced. The signal is carried on a two-conductor cable. Unbalanced signal connectors have two pins, such as the RCA (also called Phono and Cinch, commonly used by home hi-fi equipment) and the unbalanced 1/4" (used in musical instruments and semi-professional audio). Multi-pin connectors can also carry
    ... Read more
  • PAcalculate app